The nation's best paper, but...

As I've often noted here and as I say frequently in real life, the New York Times IS the nation's best newspaper. However, there's one consistent problem I've had with them within the past decade: An unfair slant of liberal writers who continue to unfairly attack liberals, while letting the real bullshit of the right-wing (see the lack of honest reporting to the run-up to the Iraq war festival) slide by unspoken and hardly covered because their editors' tiny penises are scared by the right-wing scheme machine.

The Times and other mainstream media organizations (eg: NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC) have been brown-beaten to hell by the right-wing constantly harping on them that they only favor liberal causes. It's one of the effective examples of what's happened in covering the Dubya Dumbass Administration; if the admin. reapeats a blatant falsehood enough times, it eventually will be believed and reported as a fact when it really isn't a fact (and it's likely to be far from factual). Again, ask Cleland about swift-boating.

Thus, these organizations have been more and more infiltrated by right-wing zealots (see CNN and their employment of Glenn-Fuck-Beck), and there has been a chilling effect on their ability to effectively report the bullshit that goes on in the right-wing.

All this while hyper-criticizing Democrats and their ilk, in an effort to appear more neutral when in fact they become less neutral.

See the current front page of tomorrow's NY Times. They are apparently planning a front page story tomorrow where they go after Obama's book and they are saying they cannot verify that Obama actually used marijuana, blow, and all the other drugs he claims to have tried using way back when he was a 20-something.

OF ALL THE THINGS TO BE INVESTIGATIVELY REPORTING????!!!!! ARE YOU FUCKING SHITTING ME???!!!

NY Times, again you disappoint me here. And I'm a Hillary supporter! GET A CLUE!